MOTIV

Username: Log me on automatically each visit
Password:
It is currently Fri Aug 01, 2014 5:49 am


Post a new topicPost a reply Page 1 of 1   [ 7 posts ]
Author Message
 Post subject: Which is STRONGER,, OVERALL COVERSTOCK?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 2:23 am 

Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 2:40 am
Posts: 172
Which is overall stronger of a coverstock,,, The Backdraft Motivator-Z Hybrid coverstock or The Thrash Frenzy Whiplash Pearl Reactive coverstock?

_________________
NATE A.K.A MOTIVNATOR
TX1
TZ3
QZ2
BACKDRAFT BAG
QZ1
QZ1
GT1
Thrash
Sniper BAG
Venom Toxin BAG
2 Cruel BAG
Ascent BAG
Revolt (300) BAG
Primal TV4 (NIB)
QZ2 (NIB)
Silver & Black Recon (NIB)
Rage (NIB)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Which is STRONGER,, OVERALL COVERSTOCK?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 10:03 am 

Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2009 10:43 pm
Posts: 1698
Location: Rochester NY
Whiplash by quite a bit, but the cleanliness and strong response to friction of whiplash are where the biggest differences are seen.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Which is STRONGER,, OVERALL COVERSTOCK?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 1:08 pm 

Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 2:40 am
Posts: 172
Is the Frenzy a good replacement for the Original Thrash, my Thrash is too strong for my house even when i put it at 4k no polish?

_________________
NATE A.K.A MOTIVNATOR
TX1
TZ3
QZ2
BACKDRAFT BAG
QZ1
QZ1
GT1
Thrash
Sniper BAG
Venom Toxin BAG
2 Cruel BAG
Ascent BAG
Revolt (300) BAG
Primal TV4 (NIB)
QZ2 (NIB)
Silver & Black Recon (NIB)
Rage (NIB)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Which is STRONGER,, OVERALL COVERSTOCK?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 1:46 pm 

Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2009 10:43 pm
Posts: 1698
Location: Rochester NY
Have you tried polish on the Thrash? The Frenzy will be longer but also stronger in the backend than the original.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Which is STRONGER,, OVERALL COVERSTOCK?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 3:35 pm 

Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 2:40 am
Posts: 172
No I have not tried polish on my Thrash, I don't like altering bowling balls i.e , if it a dull peice, i would use pads only,,polish, i keep it polish with higher or lower pads, bit i put polish back on it... I like to see the natural motion of the ball whether polishes or not, just keeping them close to oob as possible.

_________________
NATE A.K.A MOTIVNATOR
TX1
TZ3
QZ2
BACKDRAFT BAG
QZ1
QZ1
GT1
Thrash
Sniper BAG
Venom Toxin BAG
2 Cruel BAG
Ascent BAG
Revolt (300) BAG
Primal TV4 (NIB)
QZ2 (NIB)
Silver & Black Recon (NIB)
Rage (NIB)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Which is STRONGER,, OVERALL COVERSTOCK?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 4:54 pm 

Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2009 10:43 pm
Posts: 1698
Location: Rochester NY
OOB is just that, out of box. Its relevance ends once the ball leaves the box, no need to stick to it.

Polish it, they roll great with some shine. The cover on the Thrash has a slower response time to friction than Whiplash. If that doesn't solve your problem then we can look at other options.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Which is STRONGER,, OVERALL COVERSTOCK?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 5:26 pm 

Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2013 8:10 pm
Posts: 1
it would have to be the thrash Frenzy Whiplash Pearl Reactive coverstock its just so clean threw the front but violent in the back!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post a new topicPost a reply Page 1 of 1   [ 7 posts ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group

MOTIV