| Author |
Message |
|
MotivNator
|
Post subject: Which is STRONGER,, OVERALL COVERSTOCK?  Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 2:23 am |
|
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 2:40 am
Posts: 167
|
|
Which is overall stronger of a coverstock,,, The Backdraft Motivator-Z Hybrid coverstock or The Thrash Frenzy Whiplash Pearl Reactive coverstock?
_________________
NATE A.K.A MOTIVNATOR
TX1 (BAGGED)
TZ3 (BAGGED)
QZ2 (MAIN)
QZ2 BACKDRAFT (MAIN)
QZ1 (BAGGED),
QZ1 (BAGGED)
GT1 (MAIN)
Thrash (MAIN)
Sniper (MAIN)
Primal TV4 (NIB)
QZ2 (NIB)
Silver & Black Recon (NIB)
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
JustinWi
|
Post subject: Re: Which is STRONGER,, OVERALL COVERSTOCK? Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 10:03 am |
|
Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2009 10:43 pm
Posts: 1690
Location: Rochester NY
|
|
Whiplash by quite a bit, but the cleanliness and strong response to friction of whiplash are where the biggest differences are seen.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
MotivNator
|
Post subject: Re: Which is STRONGER,, OVERALL COVERSTOCK? Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 1:08 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 2:40 am
Posts: 167
|
|
Is the Frenzy a good replacement for the Original Thrash, my Thrash is too strong for my house even when i put it at 4k no polish?
_________________
NATE A.K.A MOTIVNATOR
TX1 (BAGGED)
TZ3 (BAGGED)
QZ2 (MAIN)
QZ2 BACKDRAFT (MAIN)
QZ1 (BAGGED),
QZ1 (BAGGED)
GT1 (MAIN)
Thrash (MAIN)
Sniper (MAIN)
Primal TV4 (NIB)
QZ2 (NIB)
Silver & Black Recon (NIB)
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
JustinWi
|
Post subject: Re: Which is STRONGER,, OVERALL COVERSTOCK? Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 1:46 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2009 10:43 pm
Posts: 1690
Location: Rochester NY
|
|
Have you tried polish on the Thrash? The Frenzy will be longer but also stronger in the backend than the original.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
MotivNator
|
Post subject: Re: Which is STRONGER,, OVERALL COVERSTOCK? Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 3:35 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 2:40 am
Posts: 167
|
|
No I have not tried polish on my Thrash, I don't like altering bowling balls i.e , if it a dull peice, i would use pads only,,polish, i keep it polish with higher or lower pads, bit i put polish back on it... I like to see the natural motion of the ball whether polishes or not, just keeping them close to oob as possible.
_________________
NATE A.K.A MOTIVNATOR
TX1 (BAGGED)
TZ3 (BAGGED)
QZ2 (MAIN)
QZ2 BACKDRAFT (MAIN)
QZ1 (BAGGED),
QZ1 (BAGGED)
GT1 (MAIN)
Thrash (MAIN)
Sniper (MAIN)
Primal TV4 (NIB)
QZ2 (NIB)
Silver & Black Recon (NIB)
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
JustinWi
|
Post subject: Re: Which is STRONGER,, OVERALL COVERSTOCK? Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 4:54 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2009 10:43 pm
Posts: 1690
Location: Rochester NY
|
|
OOB is just that, out of box. Its relevance ends once the ball leaves the box, no need to stick to it.
Polish it, they roll great with some shine. The cover on the Thrash has a slower response time to friction than Whiplash. If that doesn't solve your problem then we can look at other options.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
jakezilla
|
Post subject: Re: Which is STRONGER,, OVERALL COVERSTOCK? Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 5:26 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2013 8:10 pm
Posts: 1
|
|
it would have to be the thrash Frenzy Whiplash Pearl Reactive coverstock its just so clean threw the front but violent in the back!
|
|
| Top |
|
|
